tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25151936658967353652024-03-08T00:11:43.032-08:00Notes From the Edge of the EmpireGet aware of your literature and the historical places from which you are unknown till now.Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.comBlogger108125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-61124769553350772372009-12-22T22:21:00.000-08:002009-12-22T22:26:03.620-08:00Historic Miami Beach theater could get a second act<p> The business of photography and filmmaking in South Florida is a fraction of what it used to be. So what is a South Beach studio owner to do?</p><p> That's the question that has hung over Eugene Rodriguez for years, only now he may have an answer: Keep the studio, but add an entertainment venue.</p><p> Losing money on the historic Paris Theater, Rodriguez is about to set off on a scouting and recruiting mission in Europe, looking for talent to come to Miami Beach and turn the film and photography studio into a one-of-a-kind, weekend nights hot spot. </p> <p> ``The idea is to create a really great destination for people who want to be entertained not only by what they're seeing, but by what is around them as well,'' Rodriguez said Dec. 16, one day after receiving the go-ahead from Miami Beach's Planning Board to pursue his concept for a theater and lounge. Rodriguez needed board approval because he wants to serve alcohol.</p><p> Rodriguez said he isn't replacing the Paris Theater's daytime operations as a studio, but is adding a new, night-time component to supplement declining business from the photo and movie market, which he said is ``wiped out.''</p><p> Paris Theater has previously been operated as a nightclub, but Rodriguez stresses that he's not creating a DJ-driven dancehall.</p><p> He said he plans only minor renovations, and the segmented studios in the building will be opened up to create one lounge and theater area.</p><p> ``Right now we have furniture changes, props, and sets. Basically, it's going to be a studio as it is now,'' he said. ``When Ralph Lauren comes in now, we change sets. It's the same thing we always do, except all of the sudden there's an audience sitting in the middle of it.''</p><p> His project is still in its infancy, but ideas swirl in his head.</p><p> Rodriguez talks about establishing a creative entertainment venue inside the 26,000-square-foot, historic 1935 building, which he purchased in 1992 for just under $1 million in order to create a studio for the film and photo industry.</p><p> Since then, artists from Madonna, to U2, to the Red Hot Chili Peppers have used the studio, an aspect Rodriguez hopes will add to the energy and allure of the venue.</p><p> Rodriguez says international performers could come for a three-month stint, or entertainment could consist of 15 to 20-minute vignettes. Celebrity chefs may come for a stay and the theater's big screen may be unfurled as eye candy.</p><p> He still plans to open for special events, which in the past have included fashion shows and poker nights.</p><p> With about 10 months before the next tourist season begins, Rodriguez says his main focus is getting the word out about his new project and recruiting talent. He said he leaves Christmas Day for a trip to London and Paris, and later to New York.</p><p> ``From now until September it's all about coming up with ideas,'' he said, ``and seeing what's out there and seeing what's coming our way.''</p>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-48793233970939821542009-03-17T07:07:00.001-07:002009-03-17T07:07:51.071-07:00The Conservative Renaissance is Here<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>First, I must measure up the statute title as it looks to propose a nefarious collusion between the rules about which this article is designed, which is neither the lawsuit nor my intent. I will support the title, however, on the evidence that the evident ensnarement of Rahm Emanuel is all the indicant needed to reason that, as accidental as the scene of the trap may have got got been, it yielded the same consequences of one who would have intentionally put it.</p><p>Rush Limbaugh brought the house down at the CPAC convention on Saturday, something I am benchmarking as the beginning of the Conservative Renaissance, and the death of broad laterality in the early 21st century. Oddly enough, I also applauded the election of Michael Sir Richrd Steele to RNC Chair a few hebdomads ago, and as fate would have got got it, he and Haste have go embroiled in a spot of a tiff. What a delectation for the chief watercourse mass media who have got made a bungalow industry out of misquoting Limbaugh for personal gain.</p><p>Michael Sir Richrd Steele was being interviewed by CNN's D.L. Hughley on Saturday nighttime shortly after Limbaugh's address to CPAC. During one exchange, Sir Richrd Steele referred to Rush's show as "incendiary and ugly", something that begot an divine response from the radiocommunication host on today's show. Michael Sir Richrd Steele was speedy to rectify himself, saying that he said something he didn't mean. To be honest, I am usually disbelieving when person kicks of being taken out of context, but I believe Sir Richrd Steele in this instance.</p><p>The problem, however, is the ground that he said what he said at all, and that was made abundantly clear in Limbaugh's tirade. Michael Sir Richrd Sir Richrd Steele establish himself in a place with Hughley that - in Steele's mind, at least - compelled him to act in precisely the mode of which Limbaugh kicks where alleged conservativists are concerned; he briefly abandoned unity for the interest of appearing to understand the left's contempt for Limbaugh.</p><p>This have got go an unconscious wont amongst conservativists who for too long have felt inferior to - and therefore in demand of - a degree of credence from the left. What Limbaugh have got been trying for quite some to clip to acquire across is our ability to lift up and fight, and blessing and credence by the resistance be damned.</p><p>Make no mistake, progressives are the resistance and they have been stepping on our pharynxes for much too long. They railing on about Limbaugh's wishing for Obama's docket to fail, yet they predicted, hoped for, and ultimately claimed that President Shrub had failed. At least Limbaugh is honorable about it, even as the mass media deliberately falsifies his words.</p><p>The reaction of the crowd at the CPAC address was heartening. Steele's hastiness in apologizing is also encouraging. The lone thing that tin maintain us down this clip is for the Obama disposal to suddenly co-opt our philosophy. I am not worried in the least about that ever happening.</p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-65472073743824198022009-03-13T02:53:00.001-07:002009-03-13T02:53:50.075-07:00The Conservative Renaissance is Here<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>First, I must measure up the statute title as it looks to propose a nefarious collusion between the rules about which this article is designed, which is neither the lawsuit nor my intent. I will support the title, however, on the evidence that the evident ensnarement of Rahm Emanuel is all the indicant needed to reason that, as accidental as the scene of the trap may have got got been, it yielded the same consequences of one who would have intentionally put it.</p><p>Rush Limbaugh brought the house down at the CPAC convention on Saturday, something I am benchmarking as the beginning of the Conservative Renaissance, and the death of broad laterality in the early 21st century. Oddly enough, I also applauded the election of Michael Sir Richrd Steele to RNC Chair a few hebdomads ago, and as fate would have got got it, he and Haste have go embroiled in a spot of a tiff. What a delectation for the chief watercourse mass media who have got made a bungalow industry out of misquoting Limbaugh for personal gain.</p><p>Michael Sir Richrd Steele was being interviewed by CNN's D.L. Hughley on Saturday nighttime shortly after Limbaugh's address to CPAC. During one exchange, Sir Richrd Steele referred to Rush's show as "incendiary and ugly", something that begot an divine response from the radiocommunication host on today's show. Michael Sir Richrd Steele was speedy to rectify himself, saying that he said something he didn't mean. To be honest, I am usually disbelieving when person kicks of being taken out of context, but I believe Sir Richrd Steele in this instance.</p><p>The problem, however, is the ground that he said what he said at all, and that was made abundantly clear in Limbaugh's tirade. Michael Sir Richrd Sir Richrd Steele establish himself in a place with Hughley that - in Steele's mind, at least - compelled him to act in precisely the mode of which Limbaugh kicks where alleged conservativists are concerned; he briefly abandoned unity for the interest of appearing to understand the left's contempt for Limbaugh.</p><p>This have got go an unconscious wont amongst conservativists who for too long have felt inferior to - and therefore in demand of - a degree of credence from the left. What Limbaugh have got been trying for quite some to clip to acquire across is our ability to lift up and fight, and blessing and credence by the resistance be damned.</p><p>Make no mistake, progressives are the resistance and they have been stepping on our pharynxes for much too long. They railing on about Limbaugh's wishing for Obama's docket to fail, yet they predicted, hoped for, and ultimately claimed that President Shrub had failed. At least Limbaugh is honorable about it, even as the mass media deliberately falsifies his words.</p><p>The reaction of the crowd at the CPAC address was heartening. Steele's hastiness in apologizing is also encouraging. The lone thing that tin maintain us down this clip is for the Obama disposal to suddenly co-opt our philosophy. I am not worried in the least about that ever happening.</p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-71709759181310868332009-03-09T11:53:00.001-07:002009-03-09T11:53:17.471-07:00Poverty - Who Are the Poor?<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>After the Katrina catastrophe more people talked about the mediocre and of course of study the authorities and large concern would love to maintain the Numbers low as possible on just how many mediocre there are. This is to do things look better than they really are. In respective news narratives I've heard respective different numbers: between 35 million to 50 million mediocre in the U.S. Last year, 1.1 million more than people joined the ranks of the poor, that is up by 12.7% from 2004. Person even said, if you had a room-full of economic experts you could acquire almost as many Numbers and what defines person as mediocre as there are economists. National statistics states anyone devising roughly $10,000 or less is poor. Who can dwell on so little?</p><p>Here is how I define poor: Anyone not making at least a Living Wage is poor. So, what is a Living Wage? Here are the classes and Numbers I utilize to demo monthly expenses: (Keep in mind, the cost of life is not all the same across the U.S. These are only general figs to supply an illustration here.)</p><p>Rent $795, Food $550, Clothing $90, Toiletry $30, Telephone $45, Transportation System $95, Checkup $85, Education $80, Retirement $250, Emergency Savings $200, Taxes $580 – for a sum monthly income of $2,800. These Numbers are based on numerous conversations with a big figure of people I have got worked with, met in java houses or online, on the autobus and anywhere else I would ran into someone.</p><p>How did I come up by these categories? Simple. Nothing on the listing is extravagance, all of them are necessary. I don't believe the basics: rent, food, clothing, toiletry can be disputed because we all usage them. As for the telephone and transportation, they are both necessary to maintaining a job. As more than than employers cut down employee benefits, the cost of things like medical disbursals displacement into the custody of the individual employee and is therefor included in this list.</p><p>We have got all heard the news about societal security and the demand for people to salvage more of their ain money, so a retirement class was added. Since we never cognize when we might go unemployed and current recommendation by fiscal advisor's is that we salvage up for 12 calendar months of unemployment or what if we confront unexpected medical disbursals which, which is the ground for the exigency nest egg fund. Lastly, the taxations are in this listing because we don't have got a pick in whether or not we can pay income taxes. That conveys it to a annual sum just under $35,000 a year. Not a batch to inquire for in a Living Wage.</p><p>You might inquire yourself at this point, so why aren't employers paying a Living Wage? Profits. Pure and simple, it is the greed of those at the top of big corporations, keeping reward low. Companies like McDonalds and WalMart have got lobbyist to maintain the lower limit pay from being raised above the poorness degree just to maintain their net income growing. So, it is up to you to raise your voice if you experience differently, or the figure of mediocre volition only increase and we will go a 3rd human race state leading in poverty.</p><p>Sound far fetched? Not at all when you look at the definition of a 3rd human race state which is one that importations more than it exports and it can not pay it's debt to the world. That's where we are at right now. So, believe again, then make something about it, or a state like People'S Republic Of China may just demand payment on our debts and you may just have got to larn what's in those small redness books. Can you say, Mao!</p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-90953420392569337932009-03-06T08:37:00.001-08:002009-03-06T08:37:41.223-08:00Poverty - Who Are the Poor?<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>After the Katrina catastrophe more people talked about the mediocre and of course of study the authorities and large concern would love to maintain the Numbers low as possible on just how many mediocre there are. This is to do things look better than they really are. In respective news narratives I've heard respective different numbers: between 35 million to 50 million mediocre in the U.S. Last year, 1.1 million more than people joined the ranks of the poor, that is up by 12.7% from 2004. Person even said, if you had a room-full of economic experts you could acquire almost as many Numbers and what defines person as mediocre as there are economists. National statistics states anyone devising roughly $10,000 or less is poor. Who can dwell on so little?</p><p>Here is how I define poor: Anyone not making at least a Living Wage is poor. So, what is a Living Wage? Here are the classes and Numbers I utilize to demo monthly expenses: (Keep in mind, the cost of life is not all the same across the U.S. These are only general figs to supply an illustration here.)</p><p>Rent $795, Food $550, Clothing $90, Toiletry $30, Telephone $45, Transportation System $95, Checkup $85, Education $80, Retirement $250, Emergency Savings $200, Taxes $580 – for a sum monthly income of $2,800. These Numbers are based on numerous conversations with a big figure of people I have got worked with, met in java houses or online, on the autobus and anywhere else I would ran into someone.</p><p>How did I come up by these categories? Simple. Nothing on the listing is extravagance, all of them are necessary. I don't believe the basics: rent, food, clothing, toiletry can be disputed because we all usage them. As for the telephone and transportation, they are both necessary to maintaining a job. As more than than employers cut down employee benefits, the cost of things like medical disbursals displacement into the custody of the individual employee and is therefor included in this list.</p><p>We have got all heard the news about societal security and the demand for people to salvage more of their ain money, so a retirement class was added. Since we never cognize when we might go unemployed and current recommendation by fiscal advisor's is that we salvage up for 12 calendar months of unemployment or what if we confront unexpected medical disbursals which, which is the ground for the exigency nest egg fund. Lastly, the taxations are in this listing because we don't have got a pick in whether or not we can pay income taxes. That conveys it to a annual sum just under $35,000 a year. Not a batch to inquire for in a Living Wage.</p><p>You might inquire yourself at this point, so why aren't employers paying a Living Wage? Profits. Pure and simple, it is the greed of those at the top of big corporations, keeping reward low. Companies like McDonalds and WalMart have got lobbyist to maintain the lower limit pay from being raised above the poorness degree just to maintain their net income growing. So, it is up to you to raise your voice if you experience differently, or the figure of mediocre volition only increase and we will go a 3rd human race state leading in poverty.</p><p>Sound far fetched? Not at all when you look at the definition of a 3rd human race state which is one that importations more than it exports and it can not pay it's debt to the world. That's where we are at right now. So, believe again, then make something about it, or a state like People'S Republic Of China may just demand payment on our debts and you may just have got to larn what's in those small redness books. Can you say, Mao!</p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-61058988681384552102009-01-15T05:06:00.001-08:002009-01-15T05:06:01.310-08:00Quit Your Complaining! Please<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>OK modern times are tough, admitted. We listen to the Judgment Day studies on the day-to-day news, everyone is talking about it. Some folks are pulling money out of the depository financial institution and squirreling it away. Others throw on hoping the newly elected president is going to moving ridge his magic wand and set an end to the worry.</p><p>If you clear your head enough from the outpouring of bad news for a couple of proceedings and recognize that there are two sides to every narrative (but the other side doesn't sell newspapers), you will recognize that there is hope for you yet. Let's research the other side, shall we?</p><p>*When Iodine was a child gas was about 50 cents a gallon, and it was better gas too!</p><p>Yes, but your auto only got 10 statute miles to the gallon and it had no safety features, except a lap strap to maybe maintain your dead organic structure with the car.</p><p>* Bread was only 25 cents a loaf of breadstuff back in the day.</p><p>They advertised that it helped your organic structure turn about a twelve ways but turns out it had zero nutrition.</p><p>*You never had a fearfulness of losing your job, you could work in one topographic point forever.</p><p>They didn't pay much, that's wherefore bread was 25 cents and gas was 50 cents.</p><p>* The terms at the large box supplies are even getting out of manus these days.</p><p>Start supporting your neighbours by shopping local so you will maintain them from going out of business, and turning those large box supplies into monopolies.</p><p>*once upon a clip you could purchase a place for $30,000.00 </p><p>That same place sells for $250,000.00+ today. Nice profit!</p><p>*The grocery shop store terms are killing me.</p><p>Eat out once in a while; if you remain away from the fanciest restaurants, it can actually be cheaper than making the same repast at home, and you might maintain another neighbour from shutting their business.</p><p>I won't beat out a dead Equus caballus any longer. All Iodine inquire is that you happen a ground to smile! It's not alteration that's devising you fear, its likely fearfulness of change that's devising you nervous.</p><p>Be willing measure out of the box and make something different for a while. It's our ability to accommodate that beef ups us and do us better prepared for what come ups our way. If you're not stepping out of your comfortableness zone and doing something new each day, then you are not going to be ready when alteration is forced upon you. If things aren't changing then beware, the human race have stopped turning.</p><p>I assure you that the glass is half full and you're going to be just good (unless you would rather be miserable?).</p><p>Matthew Lombardi</p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-16800509658257930922009-01-13T06:00:00.001-08:002009-01-13T06:00:37.331-08:00Consumers, Not the Government, Have Power to Fix the Economy<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>When I was immature talking about millions of dollars impressed me. When I was aged talking about billions of dollars aghast me. Now, regular talking about millions of dollars, especially authorities spending, nauseates me. People never look to larn that they command the fate of the American economy.</p><p>It is far too easy to fault in bad modern modern times or give thanks in good times Wall Street, the government, or super-rich and powerful fiscal entities. In existent fact it is always the disbursement of money by the general population on consumer merchandises and services, housing, cars, or investings that thrusts the economy. The core job is that the public makes not move in concert to function its ain involvements but, instead, takes its cues from the external human race and sets its trust in the incorrect people and entities.</p><p>In other words, besides all the incrimination that rightfully can be heaped on many others for the current recession, it is also true that the public through its dollars drove the state and the human race into the current meltdown, mostly by using far too much borrowing. They got suckered into using easy credit. True, in many cases, they acted on wrong and intentionally deceptive information and were taken advantage of. But so much of this consumer behaviour was driven by greed or stupidity. Assurance was placed in authorities regulation, Congress, mortgage and other fiscal companies, banks, and more than generally in the plutocracy that tallies everything that matters. We had delusional prosperity because most of the population had willingly allow themselves be deluded or manipulated by the powerfulness elites running the authorities and the economy. In essence, consumer powerfulness was usurped or pirated by the worst people in our society.</p><p>Here is the most critical fact. Consumers control over two one-thirds of the economical activity of the nation. Long before the current economical meltdown I kept writing about the possible political powerfulness of consumers. To acquire desired authorities actions, billions of consumers could endanger to cut their disbursement in order to acquire actions, like fillet the Republic Of Iraq warfare or impeaching Saint George W. Bush. But without leading consumers just kept adoption and spending, maintaining the delusional prosperity that they themselves propelled. Now they must move to repair things.</p><p>Now that the economical meltdown have hit us very, very difficult it is critically of import for people to understand that depending on the usual powerfulness groupings to turn the economic system around is dumb. Thinking that President Obama, United States Congress and assorted federal agencies, in particular, will salvage us is continuing the delusional thought that have been like a chronic disease.</p><p>American consumers must understand that literally within years and hebdomads THEY themselves could turn around the economy. I was struck by information from the Federal Soldier Modesty that there is, even after the monstrous economical meltdown, presently a historical amount of hard cash is in depository financial institution and money marketplace accounts, an dumbfounding $8.85 trillion. Look at that figure again. Relative to all the authorities bailouts and likely actions to excite the economy, that figure is remarkable. That thumping amount of hard hard cash (not the value of places and investments) come ups to about $29,000 for every man, adult female and kid in the nation, or roughly $88,000 per household.</p><p>Your first idea may be "I don't have got that sort of cash!" In fact, economical inequality have risen terribly in recent years, helped by assorted populace policies, making the flush rich and the rich super-rich (and most of the center social class poorer). This agency that much of this national hard hard cash belongs to a relatively little fraction of the population, perhaps 20 to 30 million people.</p><p>No substance how much cash we have, we must set our religion in ourselves more than than the authorities or the concern and investing sectors to turn the economic system around. The more than hard cash you have, of course, the greater your possible powerfulness to force economical recovery. We often hear about consumer confidence. Whether people are in the temper to pass or whether they have got go too afraid for their personal fiscal security, causing them to pass as small as possible.</p><p>To bend the stock marketplace and just about every section of the private sector around, 10 to 20 million Americans must catch their built-in consumer powerfulness and begin disbursement and investment with gusto, from place appliances, computers, cars, clothing, furniture, new homes, travel, and so on.</p><p>The stock marketplace would immediately begin to climb up up, retail supplies would halt closing, the automotive sector would restart producing cars, companies would begin rehiring and the news mass media would start pumping out good news that, in turn, would trip still more than consumer assurance and spending. Suddenly, a positive spiral of economical activity replaces the billboard of hard cash that have driven the negative economical spiral.</p><p>Think of that figure $8.85 trillion again. Think of it relative to the millions and millions constantly talked about to spur economical recovery through bailouts and other authorities actions, all of which must somehow conduct money into consumers' pockets or do recognition for them more than available. A modest fraction of all that cash, state a quarter, have the economical powerfulness to make more than good than anything the authorities does. Better than all those authorities actions is the absolute certainty that rapid additions in consumer disbursement and investing would definitely drive the economic system upwards. Positive consumer assurance can feed on itself psychologically, go a viral message that shoots the economic system forward, changes by reversal unemployment, make pillory and common finances and, therefore, retirement business relationships more valuable, and so on.</p><p>We sure could utilize some national leading that motivates and inspires utilize of consumer power, rather than all the blabbering about what the authorities should or should not do. Americans have got the pick to depend on politicians or to depend on themselves. Either usage YOUR cash-power Oregon stay victims of greed and corruption, as well as the inevitable incompetency of politicians and authorities officials. Consumer powerfulness expects you. The state necessitates it to avoid still more than monolithic federal shortages and adoption and inevitable taxation increases. We the people must make much than vote; we must utilize our dollars to salvage our ain fiscal health. Unless we switch our thought and spend, we will remain in economical Hell for a long time. We with hard cash are the economical stimulation solution we've been waiting for. Economic inequality produced a big Upper Berth Class; they benefitted from many populace policies in recent old age and it is THEM that must begin spending. If we wait for the bulk of Americans to recover fiscal wellness to begin disbursement we will wait A VERY long TIME.</p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-56917187730788269172009-01-08T04:40:00.001-08:002009-01-08T04:40:57.409-08:00Censorship in America<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>The government of the South Bullshit Branch Library, Ashville, NC censored A book given to it by a friend of mine. The book was donated to the library, and reviewed for about 5 weeks. Then the donor received A phone call to delight come up and pick up the book. The library declined to stock the book. The library government obviously do not desire the people to cognize its contents.</p><p>Librarians are supposed to accept, catalogue and make books available to be read by the people-especially donated books. If a individual travels through all the cost, troubles and jobs of authorship and publication a book and donates a transcript to a library, the bibliothec have got no other option but to catalogue the book and have it on the shelves for readers to peruse. I can see that a library can pick and take when buying books from their ain budget, but that regulation cannot be applied to donated books.</p><p>Librarians are not censors--at least not in a supposedly democratic free country. People, including high school students, must have got the chance to read books that involvements them. </p><p>If censoring in United States is the new educational standard, people are considered by authorities to be nil less than immature animals that cannot find what is acceptable or unacceptable to their ain taste, wonder and demand to understand the human race and spirit that environments them. </p><p>It may very well be the policy of libraries throughout America. This is obviously in misdemeanor of the state fundamental laws and in misdemeanor of the Amendments of the United States Fundamental Law dealing with free fourth estate and the people's right to freely talk up and compose up, and listen and read. Censoring is a distasteful, un-American activity! It cannot be tolerated to be practiced by American governments. </p><p>We are supposed to live in such as a liberated and censor-free society. What is in the book that authorities makes not desire you to know?</p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-58432583325362072202008-12-29T02:36:00.001-08:002008-12-29T02:36:04.083-08:00Using Information to Weed Out Corruption<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>Wikipedia defines corruptness as, "<i>impairment of integrity, virtuousness or moral principle; depravity, decay, and/or an incentive to incorrect by improper or unlawful means, a going from the original or from what is pure or correct, and/or an federal agency or influence that corrupts</i>."</p><p>The above definition is quite clear and we can very well understand from the above definition as to what exactly corruptness is. Inch general speaking, we state a individual is corrupt when we happen him/her not fulfilling his/her duties and indulging in incorrect practices. Corruptness is ubiquitous and quite prevailing in those societies where people are not witting of their rights and make not experience responsible towards the society or surrounding they are living in.</p><p>The root cause of corruptness is wearing away of moral values and most importantly, our via media with the negative state of affairs i.e. we accept it as a manner of life. Our life is so fast that we don't have got clip for anything else. If we land in a state of affairs which is stopping us to accomplish our end we immediately throw the custody of corruptness to acquire to the other side. In doing so, we often bury and sabotage the consequences. According to me corruptness can be classified in two groups:</p><p>1) Need based corruption<br /><br/>2) Greed based corruption</p><p><b>Need based corruption</b> - It originates when there is big disparity in the income of people. They may belong to either same business office or same nation. The individual with high income can afford all the necessities of life whereas the individual with low income is not able to make so. In this situation, the individual with low income indulges in corruptness but the cause for this scenario is his/her needs. Since the individual was not able to carry through his demands so he/she set aside the honestness and follow the way of corruption. But this corruptness may be short lived as the individual may experience uncomfortable because of his/her conscience. Moreover, the individual may seek to counterbalance his/her incorrect behavior by doing some good under-cover and keeping in head that he/she never indulges in such as patterns which may seriously harm the society.</p><p><b>Greed based corruption</b> - As the name suggests, the implicit in cause of this type of corruptness is "greed". In footing of corruption, it can be defined as deep selfish desire for money, power, position and mercenary things. It originates from within when a individual is loath to drill self-restraint and indulges in incorrect methods to accomplish things which necessitate forbearance and difficult work to own. In this case, the individual go slave of extravagance (while he/she believes the other manner round) and completely perverts from the way of righteousness. The people of autumn in this class are self-centered and never believe of either the people who are getting affected by their incorrect behavior nor make they waver in indulging anti-human and anti-national activities.</p><p>Now allow us calculate out how to utilize Information to battle the corruptness First of all we necessitate to understand how the organisations indulge in corruption? It is quite easy for the organisations to make so as they utilize our ignorance as their best tactic. Whenever we travel to some business business office to acquire our work done we normally are not aware of the work flowing in that office. To acquire our work done speedily we either pay payoff or take the aid of touts. Now conceive of a state of affairs where we are well acquainted with the work flow. Volition you take the aid of a middleman? Volition you pay bribe? The reply is large NO.</p><p>E-governance tin be very well used to carry through it. Every organisation can supply the necessary information on its website using which any individual can acquire his job solved without requiring anyone's help. If the information searcher feel that some information is left out then he/she may utilize Right to Information Act (to cognize more than about it, mention to my article "Right to Information Act India")to obtain it. By putting information online, the function of touts is completely abolished i.e. they don't come up in image who play a major function in corruptness cycle. Moreover, by putting the information online the sections can very well pass on any updating done thereby keeping the operation of the system quite transparent. When all updated information is set on a website, then no 1 can indulge in corruptness and the hold in any procedure can immediately be recognized and stairway can be taken to take it or inspection and repair the system, as the lawsuit may be.</p><p>In the concluding portion I would wish to state that by being crystalline every organisation not only facilitates people connected to it but also assist itself by creating a good mental image in the eyes of public and enactment responsibly. The function information can't be undermined and I believe it's the best manner to struggle corruption.</p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-36473738375010403432008-12-12T04:50:00.001-08:002008-12-12T04:50:20.633-08:00A "Main Street" View of the Auto Industry Bailout<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>As I watch the automakers, politicians, and talking caputs on television argument the bailout of the car industry, it looks obvious to me that most of them just apparent don't acquire it.</p><p>ON CNBC, I heard the governor of Wolverine State inquire why Main Street is against the bailout. She desires to cognize why they (we) don't recognize that the failure of the car industry will adversely impact the full country?</p><p>Well, I have got her answer.</p><p>We on "Main Street" cannot understand why we should give the car shapers the money to pay the autoworkers %73/hr piece we "common people" throughout the remainder of the state are struggling to do ends ran into on $20/hr or less.</p><p>That reply may be over-simplified, but it travels to the bosom of our objections. We are tired of paying for corporate parties, aureate parachutes, fleets of executive director jets, and other surpluses with our taxation dollars.</p><p>The fact that the automakers were totally aghast when the politicians chided them for flying to the meetings, each on a separate private jet, additional affirms the thought that they just don't acquire it.</p><p>These automakers have got stuck their caputs in the sand for years, refusing to do every other combustible vehicles and/or even more than energy-efficient vehicles. Now, they state they are willing to do this and they desire us to give them money to make what they should have got done old age ago.</p><p>It additional cholers us when the caput of the labor labor union travels on television and states that the union declines to make any further concessions. To us, this sounds like pure arrogance. To us, he is saying that they are so much better than us that they rate to be paid over 3 modern times what we make. This makes not elicit understanding for them. It do us experience that we should allow the automakers declare bankruptcy so that they can throw out the labor union contracts.</p><p>The "talking heads" are nearly as clueless. Later, still on CNBC, one of the analysts cited the fact that gas terms are down as an indicant that people can now travel back to purchasing the SUVs and other gas guzzlers. When another subscriber tried to point out that it was more than likely that consumers were not buying because they were unsure about their jobs, she appeared to go confused. Apparently, the recession isn't affecting her income.</p><p>It is also obvious that the politicians were surprised when the $700 billion they approved to bailout the banking industry hasn't been used as promised in the hearings. DUH! Don't any of them have got teenagers?</p><p>Anyone with adolescents is painfully aware that, once you turn loose of the cash, you will never see it again - and probably never see the points it was earmarked to buy, either - UNLESS you had the foresightedness to set limitations in topographic point beforehand.</p><p>If those of us on "Main Street" were to run our places and households and little concerns in the mode that these people are running the car industry and our government, we would all be in the mediocre house.</p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-57721173166883582022008-12-10T04:06:00.001-08:002008-12-10T04:06:53.144-08:00Obama and Biden Proved My Previous Article Wrong, I Said They Had No Chance at the White House<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>In March of 2007, I said there was no manner the general populace would elect Barack Obama. I even made a comment about how Joe Biden didn't have got a chance. I can acknowledge when I was wrong. I wouldn't be a base up cat if I didn't turn to my statements.</p><p>I honestly didn't see how Barack Obama would win this past election. I figured he had too much of a bad history. When I wrote the article about him not going to win, that was before the Clergyman Willard Huntington Wright controversy. I thought his name would halter him. It didn't though. People flocked by the billions to vote for him.</p><p>In the article of 2007, I said people were crying out for an norm adult male or adult female to win the Presidency. I don't see Obama average. He graduated from Harvard University and it's tough to speak about him openly. There are some people who would love to do a racial issue out of something there isn't. I always experience that I have got to handle him with child gloves for the interest of not offending someone. That's no manner to be in America.</p><p>Obama admitted his drug usage while he was immature in a book. It didn't impact his campaign. Toilet McCain ran the worst political political campaign in political history. Everything was off bounds when it came to Obama, McCain agreed with him. Anytime person tried to convey up a legitimate point about Obama's affiliations, McCain said it wasn't an issue. McCain handed the business office of President over to Obama.</p><p>We'll see how great of a President Obama turns out to be. I'm not a fan of him and I wasn't a fan of McCain. I was offended as a Republican that I was forced to vote for him. I haven't talked about this with anyone and I've been in privacy from political relation since McCain winning the Republican nomination. This article is about Obama, not McCain so I will not direct any more than attending in this article to him.</p><p>I said Chief Joseph Biden didn't have got a opportunity at the White Person House because I figured he was too much of an elitist. He made it to Frailty President though. Congratulations! You proved me incorrect in my ezine article of yesteryear. Let's not do this a habit. Until the adjacent article, take care.</p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-82185947814047356812008-12-03T11:21:00.001-08:002008-12-03T11:21:38.029-08:00Qualified Help Wanted<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>It looks that everywhere we turn there are marks crying "Help Wanted" and apparently this is a province-wide concern.</p><p>Many of my clients are directors from the construction, concern and oil spot industries who are suffering from emphasis and burnout because of this. They cannot look to engage adequate employees with experience to maintain up with the demands. The result, of course, is that companies vacation spot to hiring "warm bodies" to fill up places - a state of affairs they had previously sworn they would never make - as well putting other emphasis and workloads on directors and supervisors.</p><p>The economical law of "supply and demand" is definitely at drama here. As "baby boomers" do their move towards retirement, we are beginning to recognize how their expertness will be missed and wonderment how they will be replaced. Demographics bespeak that the adjacent coevals is littler in size owed to a less birth rate. The consequence is a state of affairs where there will not be adequate workers to fill up all the places in the workplace.</p><p>We observe our dynamical economic system but must also recognize that it too lends to a staffing problem!</p><p>Canada's primary solution to the quandary is to concentrate on immigration. Over the years, I have got got watched with involvement as trained and experienced people get in Canada only to have their certificate rejected when they make not ran into our country's standards. As well, many immigrants with a great trade of expertness are forced into occupations that make not fit their accomplishments because they make not talk English. The consequence is medical docs in janitorial jobs.</p><p>It must be atrocious to get in the "promised land" only to happen that you cannot support yourself and your household in your constituted calling or pass on with others because of linguistic communication barriers!</p><p>Monte Solberg, who stands for this constituency as a Member of Parliament, have recently been appointed to function as Canada's Curate of Immigration. Fortunately he have been life in Van Wyck Brooks where there can be as many as 70 idioms spoken in an organisation so he have some penetration into the state of affairs and issues involved. My hope is that he volition acknowledge and set up policies that will adequately ran into the demands of those who are entering our state - even before they get here.</p><p>Canada necessitates skilled and experienced immigrants who will lend to and benefit from life in this country, not people who will stop up in the soup kitchens or Food Sir Joseph Banks because they cannot range their potential.</p><p>Industrial/Organizational psychologists additional the social welfare of people and the effectivity of organisations by helping people prosecute meaningful and enriching work while assisting organisations in the effectual direction of their human resources. This cannot be done in isolation, however, and it is therefore of import that the bigger systems of society work together to guarantee that in-migration is more than than adding "warm bodies" to the population base.</p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-39750803107610641572008-11-27T05:02:00.001-08:002008-11-27T05:02:22.387-08:00They Bashed President Bush For Years - Do They Think Obama is Off Limits?<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>The Shrub Family have served our great state for coevals and yet the mass media and resistance powerfulness trashed them to no end? Why, because they were on the other side of the political spectrum. But now the tabular arrays have got got turned and many Republicans state that what's just for them is fair for us.</p><p>Of course, prudence would order that at some point we have to work together as a state and halt these tit-for-tat political fictional character assassinations. Still, in triumph the Obama protagonists are busy attacking President Shrub even though they have got won, attempting to fault him for everything including Continental Drift so when President-Elect Barrack Obama acquires into office, he'll look better? <br/> <br /><br/>Amazingly enough, Barrack Obama is going to have got to dwell up to his campaign's over embroidery of praseodymium and 700 million dollars worth of advertising. It is impossible for anyone to dwell up the "god like" base that have been set forth. And if the mass media ever makes bend on Barrack Obama, then he certainly will not be able to stay effectual. <br/> <br /><br/>After all, with the mass media and the resistance political party drive down President Bush's blessing ratings, it made his abilities to take a batch tougher, who loses? We all do, and he loses credibleness in his traffic with other states owed to our world-media domination taking these verbal onslaughts to the four-corners of the Earth. <br/> <br /><br/>So, should we give Obama a free-media ride? My ideas are; Absolutely Not! And allow me state you why. First, Obama have trashed President Shrub during this campaign, and President Shrub was not even running and to this twenty-four hours Obama's campsite is going to fault anything that travels incorrect on the anterior administration. Well, personally, we should not let this. In fact, we necessitate to harshly justice the Obama Administration with the same energy that President Bush's oppositions did, just is fair.</p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-38508588411378896962008-11-03T04:28:00.001-08:002008-11-03T04:28:56.400-08:00Republicans: Only for the rich<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>SIOUX city -- The McCain/Bush theory of trickle-down economicals have failed to construct a strong economy, and this past seven old age have proven that Republican politicians don't care. They are blatantly giving money to rich people, and we are letting them.Did you cognize that rich people who do all of their income by owning pillory and getting paid dividends pay no income tax? This and other taxation cuts to rich people during this seven old age were supposed to dribble down to you and me. They claimed that these rich Republicans would utilize all of that other money to construct new mills and engage more than of us to work in them.Well, are you better off now than when Bill Bill Clinton was our president? This is all so clear that I cannot understand how any workings adult male or adult female can actually claim to be a Republican. Republicans are not for you. They are for themselves - rich people. Oil companies have got the biggest net income in the history of the full world. Other energy companies and coverage companies are swelling their burial vaults with cash. Recognition card bankers can now do immense net income from people who cannot afford them because Republicans changed the law to do it almost impossible to declare bankruptcy on recognition card debt. Other Dick Cheney friends, like Halliburton and Blackwater, have got got got been given millions of our dollars as portion of the illegal and tragical war.In malice of the last two presidential elections, I have assurance that people are generally rational and have by now figured all of this out. If you are not one of these rich people, then you are not really a Republican. Vote for Democrats. -- Spike Lee Sturgeon</p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-22775368277942080892008-11-01T10:08:00.001-07:002008-11-01T10:08:32.560-07:00U.S. House Leaders, Bush Agree on $165 Billion For Iraq War<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>Democratic and Republican leadership in<br />the U.S. House of Representatives reached understanding with the<br />Bush disposal yesterday on statute law to fund the warfares in<br />Iraq and Islamic State Of Afghanistan until President 's successor<br />is in office. </p><p>The measurement allocates about $165 billion for the wars,<br />which will fund the struggles until mid-2009. The compromise<br />also includes an extension of unemployment benefits that<br />Democrats sought and Shrub had opposed, increased educational<br />funding for returning veteran soldiers and exigency disbursement for states<br />affected by recent flooding. </p><p>The House may vote on the measurement as soon as today. </p><p>''This is a major victory,'' said White Person House Budget<br />Director . ''It rans into the president's priorities'' and<br />''lives within'' his support request. </p><p>The measurement ''gets our military personnel the support they need,''<br />House Republican Leader said in a statement. </p><p>Congress have been under pressure level to bring forth a measure --<br />without the troop-withdrawal measurements Shrub have threatened to<br />veto -- because the Defense Department was beginning to run<br />short of finances for the wars. The understanding also stops a series of<br />confrontations over disbursement on the struggles that began when<br />Democrats took control of United States Congress last year. Since then, Bush<br />has vetoed or Republican senators have got blocked Democratic<br />efforts to associate support to demands for the backdown of U.S.<br />troops from Iraq. </p><p>No Pull Out <br /> </p><p>This statute law doesn't demand that military personnel draw out. </p><p>''What have been going on is the three-cornered discussions<br />between the House, the Senate and the White Person House,'' House<br />Democratic Leader told newsmen yesterday. ''We're<br />hopeful that the Senate will go through it and the president will sign<br />it.'' <br /> </p><p>, A spokesman for Senate Democratic Leader said ''we expression forward to reviewing the House's complete<br />proposal, and we will take it up quickly once we have it.''. </p><p>The House last calendar month rejected a program to pass about $163<br />billion for the warfares because of expostulations by Republicans angry<br />about not being given chances to amend the legislation. </p><p>The House did O.K. a taxation surcharge on individuals<br />earning more than than $500,000 per twelvemonth to pay for expanded<br />veterans' benefits. The new statute law includes the veterans'<br />programs but takes the taxation surcharge, which Shrub and<br />congressional Republicans opposed. </p><p>A war-spending bill approved earlier by the Senate included<br />about $10 billion in further domestic disbursement that was<br />opposed by Bush, who had threatened to blackball any measurement that<br />exceeds his disbursement petition for the wars. </p><p>To reach the newsmen on this story:<br /> in American Capital at <br />;<br /> in American Capital at</p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-58341027703133126162008-10-30T15:48:00.001-07:002008-10-30T15:48:58.617-07:00Ahmadinejad Says U.S. Planned to Kidnap, Murder Him in Iraq<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>Iranian President <br />accused U.S. military units in Democracy Of Iraq of planning to nobble and assassinate<br />him when he visited the state in March, the state-run Islamic<br />Republic News Agency said. </p><p>Ahmadinejad, 51, refused to dwell in Baghdad's Green Zone,<br />protected by , the news federal agency cited the president as<br />saying during a seminar today. According to dependable information,<br />they intended to detain and kill him, IRNA cited Ahmadinejad as<br />saying. </p><p>The U.S. have repeatedly accused predominantly Shi'Ite Muslim<br />Iran of passing arms to Shiite reserves in Iraq, a charge<br />denied by the authorities in Tehran. The U.S. have also accused<br />Iran of seeking to construct an atomic bomb under screen of a nuclear<br />energy program, an allegation also dismissed by Ahmadinejad's<br />administration. </p><p>''Based on dependable intelligence, the enemies had planned to<br />kidnap and kill the servant'' of the Persian state during the<br />Iraq trip, Agence France-Presse cited Ahmadinejad as saying on<br />state telecasting today. ''But with the alteration of one or two of<br />our plans, their self-control was shaken.'' <br /> </p><p>To reach the newsman on this story:<br /> in Greater London at <br />.</p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-31701693831032105062008-10-28T21:46:00.001-07:002008-10-28T21:46:25.368-07:00Only Four Republicans Voted Against War Spending Bill â" Ron Paul and Jeff Flake Votes Against Supplemental Measure<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>Ron Paul </p><p>(Best Syndication News) It is official, the warfare have garnered bi-partisan support as Democrats and Republicans in the House of Representatives O.K. $162 billion for the warfares in Republic Of Iraq and Afghanistan. Although 151 Democrats voted against the measure, only 80 Democrats voted in favor. Nancy Pelosi and former Presidential campaigner Kucinich were among those who voted against it. </p><p>There were only four Republicans vote against HR2642. Lone-Star State Republican Bokkos Alice Paul and Jeff Snowflake of Grand Canyon State both opposed the measurement on conservative grounds. Both Alice Paul and Snowflake are popular among financial conservatives. Other Republicans joined with Democrats to add millions to the measure that was passed last May by the Senate. </p><p>Republican Bokkos Alice Paul believes that the monolithic disbursement in Republic Of Iraq have added to our economical woes. âYears of growing shortages have got been spurred on by the high terms tag of war, and the determination to pay that terms primarily by auxiliary disbursement rather than traditional âon-budgetâ accounting,â Alice Paul said. </p><p>âWar takes what would otherwise be productive economical capacity and transportations both that capacity, and the wealthiness it would bring forth in normal, peaceful, modern times into far less economically feasible activities.â<br /></p><p>Money is only portion of the job according to the Lone-Star State Republican. âThe warfare has, of course, made us less safe as a state and damaged our credibleness with allies and hostile states alike.â<br /></p><p>Two other Republicans voted against the bill. Congressmen Toilet Isadora Duncan of Volunteer State and Toilet Joseph Campbell of Golden State voted no. Neither of these representatives had much to state about their vote. </p><p>California Congressman and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi was asked if this tin be considered a failure by the Democrats. "It is the Republicans in the Senate who enable this policy, and it is the President of the United States who have their, who are complicit, they are complicit with the president to do certain he never have to acquire a measure on his desk with a [withdrawal] timeline, because the American people desire a timeline and his vetoing it is an unpopular move for him," said Pelosi. </p><p>By Uncle Tom Madison<br />Best Syndication News Writer<br /></p><p>Send This To<br /> </p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-45371784674336790732008-10-27T03:30:00.001-07:002008-10-27T03:30:31.527-07:00Republicans show little interest in Kelleher<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>By The Associated Press Missoula - Few Republicans at their party's state convention in Missoula wanted to ran into the Republican Party campaigner in Montana's U.S. Senate race.Bob Kelleher got a separate room in which to ran into with any Republicans interested in his message Friday. More newsmen than political party faithful showed up.Republican legislator Microphone Dorothea Lange got more than convention traffic at a tabular array where he touted his write-in campaigning for the Senate. He's challenging Kelleher and Democratic incumbent Max Baucus.Kelleher is a perennial political candidate. He captured the Republican nomination for Senate by inexplicably winning the party's six-way primary election election last month. </p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-81686980675657892202008-10-25T09:18:00.001-07:002008-10-25T09:18:27.342-07:00war in iraq / 9 killed in firefights with GIs / Military says 4 U.S. soldiers die in roadside bombings<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>sfgate_get_fprefs();<br /></p><p>(06-26) 04:00 PDT Bagdad --<br /></p><p>Nine Iraki civilians were killed Wednesday in two firefights involving U.S. soldiers, local government reported. The military said American soldiers were fired upon first in both incidents. </p><p>Four U.S. soldiers also died in wayside bombings, the U.S. armed forces said, bringing to 10 the figure of Americans killed in Republic Of Iraq since Monday, according to the American Capital Post. </p><p> In the capital, three people were killed in a fiery clang after gunshot erupted as their vehicle passed U.S. soldiers from a convoy stopped near the Bagdad International Airport to retrieve a stalled vehicle. </p><p> Officials at Yarmouk Hospital identified the dead as a director and two female employees from a depository financial institution at the airport. Iraki police force also reported that two escorts were injured. </p><p> A statement from the U.S. armed forces characterized the three as felons who opened fire on the military convoy. The statement said the assault left slug holes in the U.S. vehicles and that a arm was recovered from the wreckage. </p><p> The at odds information in the two studies could not be immediately resolved. </p><p> Earlier Wednesday outside Tikrit, about 90 statute miles north of Baghdad, six people were killed and three injured in a farmhouse that was destroyed in a U.S. air strike, police force said. A U.S. land patrol called in the work stoppage after coming under fire. </p><p> Police said the farmer, Affar Ahmed Zidan, heard the patrol outside about 2:30 a.m. local clip and fired three warning shots in the air, thinking the soldiers were thieves. </p><p> Zidan then phoned police force force for aid while concealment under a tree, saying he feared the Americans would bomb, police said. </p><p> A neighbor, Tariq Azzawi, said Zidan was killed beside the tree, and his married woman and three children were killed in the house. The infirmary raised the toll to six. </p><p> A statement from the military said the patrol was fired upon and surveillance squads observed an armed adult male move into a nearby grouping of buildings. The air work stoppage was ordered when he refused to come up out. </p><p> The adult male was killed and four women were slightly injured, but a thorough hunt did not uncover any other deaths, the statement said. </p><p> In Washington, Iraki President Jalal Talabani met with President Shrub in the White Person House. Talabani's business office released a statement saying he praised Shrub as "a great friend of the Iraki people" and pledged to work toward a security understanding between the two countries. </p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-3484064784547508352008-10-23T15:14:00.001-07:002008-10-23T15:14:20.251-07:00Republicans act, Democrats gripe<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>SLOAN, Ioway -- Senator McCain was in Ioway and visited the inundation area, and our governor did not like it, but you can be certain if it was Barack Obama touring the flooded country there would not be a job with it. It's all junior-grade politics, folks.Also the article had to do a point that President Bush's trip took tons of law enforcement military officers to supply security. Well, you can be certain if the president had not come up there would have got been major complaints. When the president flew over New Orleans instead of landing, because he did not desire to acquire in the manner of deliverance efforts, the Democrats complained about that, so he is damned if he makes and damned if he doesn't, which states me more than about the Democrats than the president.Of course, all these articles are by the AP, and everything is political relation with the AP, too. Isn't it amusing that of all the people in Cedar Rapids they talked to, all they could happen was the 1 adult female who had nil but bad things to state about President Bush. He come ups to assist and they kick and when they believe they cognize everything about New Orleans, they gripe.Seems unusual we never heard all this resentment from Mississippi. Know what the difference is? Mississippi River had a Republican governor who ran things at the clip of Katrina and Pelican State had a Democrat governor who ran things. Ioway have a Democrat governor who runs things.Republicans acquire things done, Democrats gripe. -- Peggy Ping</p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-51655807904642195582008-10-21T20:38:00.001-07:002008-10-21T20:38:01.765-07:00Politics of US court's gun ruling - BBC News<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p><br />The legal 1s are not yet clear. Much depends on whether this federal opinion is seen as applying to other states or cities, which have got similarly tough gun laws. </p><p><br />In his bulk brief, Justice Antonin Scalia predicted future, complex legal statements about some of the restrictions, which the tribunal had ruled were valid, such as as as denying the sale of guns to convicted criminals or people with mental unwellnesses and outlawing their possession, in topographic points such as schools. </p><p><br />But - with the presidential political campaign well under manner - the political impact have been immediate. </p><p><br />'Elitist view'<br /></p><p><br />Both prima campaigners have got offered their positions on the ruling. </p><p><br />First out of the blocks was Republican, Toilet McCain, who had filed his ain legal brief in support of the complainant in the case, District of Columbia security guard Dick Heller. </p><p> Today's opinion acknowledges that gun ownership is a cardinal right - sacred, just as the right to free address and assembly<br /> </p><p> Toilet McCain</p><p><br />He applauded the Court's determination and wasted no clip in taking a swipe at his Democratic opponent, Barack Obama. </p><p><br />Referring to the remark made by the Prairie State Senator during the primary season, about bitter, working social class Americans "who cleave to guns and religion", Senator McCain said "unlike the elitist position that believes Americans cleave to guns out of bitterness, today's opinion acknowledges that gun ownership is a cardinal right - sacred, just as the right to free address and assembly". </p><p><br />His end was transparent. </p><p><br />He wanted to utilize the court's determination to reenforce the feeling that his opposition is an elite liberal, out of touching with the positions of hard-working, gun-owning Americans. </p><p><br />Democrats have got traditionally had a difficult clip dealing with gun issues and Barack Obama is no exception. </p><p><br />Who benefits? </p><p><br />Last year, a spokesman for his political campaign said that Senator Obama felt the tough District of Columbia gun law was constitutional, although, as clip have gone on, the campaigner himself have taken a more than detached position of the lawsuit in public. </p><p><br />He certainly took more than clip to respond to the Court's determination than Toilet McCain and, when he did, he said that supporting gun rights and some gun controls was not a contradiction, emphasising the portion of the Court's ruling, which stressed that the right to have weaponry was not unlimited. </p><p> Have Mister Obama changed his place on gun regulations?</p><p><br />And the campaigner - who was once a community worker in Chicago's South Side - referred to his empathy with the issue of urban, gun-related crime:<br /></p><p><br />"I have got always believed that the Second Amendment protects the right of people to bear arms," he said, "but I also place with the demand for crime-ravaged communities to salvage their children from the force that plagues our streets through common sense, effectual safety measures."<br /></p><p><br />So - who profits most? </p><p><br />The reply is, it probably makes not substance that much. </p><p><br />A candidate's position on gun control is improbable to rock more than than a little per centum of electors in November and, while Toilet McCain may have got got got improved his stock among those gun owners, who have objected to some of his places on gun issues, Barack Obama's nuanced response probably will not have changed voters' positions of him that much. </p><p><br />Yet, for all his talking of change, the Democratic presidential campaigner probably shares 1 thing with his predecessors: the hope that the gun argument travels away soon. </p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-36460057670347289342008-10-20T02:18:00.001-07:002008-10-20T02:18:42.378-07:00Iraq hearings highlight differences between McCain, Democrats<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p> Washington (CNN) -- The crisp differences between the Democratic and Republican presidential campaigners over the warfare in Republic Of Iraq shared the limelight Tuesday during Senate hearings. </p><p>Sen. Barack Obama called the invasion of Republic Of Republic Of Republic Of Republic Of Republic Of Republic Of Iraq a "massive strategical blunder" at Senate hearings Tuesday.</p><p> Sen. Toilet McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, said that success in Iraq was "within reach" at the beginning of the high-profile hearing on Iraq involving Gen. Saint David Petraeus, the top U.S. full general in Iraq, and Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker, the top American diplomatist in Baghdad.</p><p> "Our end -- my end -- is an Iraq that no longer necessitates American troops, and I believe we can accomplish that goal, perhaps sooner than many imagine," McCain said. </p><p> "But I also believe that the promise of backdown of our military units regardless of the effects would represent a failure of political and moral leadership."</p><p> "Success -- the constitution of peaceful, democratic state, the licking of terrorism -- this success is within reach," he said. "Congress must not take to lose in Iraq. We must take to succeed." </p><p> In evident response to McCain, Sen. Edmund Hillary said Tuesday that the antonym was true: It would be "irresponsible" to go on a failing policy in Iraq. </p><p> She said it was "time to get an orderly procedure of withdrawing our troops" from Republic Of Iraq in order to concentrate on Islamic State Of Afghanistan and other U.S. interests. </p><p> "It might well be irresponsible to go on the policy that have got not produced consequences that have been promised clip and clip again," she said, noting a "lack of political advancement over the past six months" in Iraq. </p><p> Sherwood Anderson Peter Cooper 360°</p><p><br />What's the truth about the troop rush in Iraq? What's next? Tonight, 10 ET<br /></p><p> And Sen. Barack , a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, questioned whether the statuses put by U.S. commanding officers for backdown would take to a warfare that could endure 20 to 30 years. </p><p> He called the invasion of Republic Of Republic Of Iraq a "massive strategical blunder" that enabled aluminum Qaeda and Islamic Republic Of Iran to distribute their influence into Iraq, and he said the United States should coerce Iraki functionaries to settle down the warfare by threatening to leave. </p><p> "Nobody's request for a precipitous withdrawal. But I make believe it have to be a measured, but increased, pressure level and a diplomatic rush that includes Iran," Obama said. "Because if [Prime Curate Nuri al-Maliki] tin endure normal neighbor-to-neighbor dealings in Iran, then we should be talking to them as well. I make not believe we're going to be able to stabilise the state of affairs without them." </p><p> Iraq's embassador to the United States said Tuesday that the United States have got to maintain its military units in his state unless it desires Islamic Republic Of Iran to have a free manus in Iraq. </p><p> , Bill Clinton and Obama questioned Petraeus and Crocker during their visual aspect before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday. McCain is the committee's top Republican. </p><p> Before the hearings began, Obama and Bill Clinton took to the airs to criticise McCain for supporting a long-term deployment of U.S. military personnel in Iraq. Don't Miss </p><p> "The job is that there is no end in sight because Toilet McCain have not offered any clear point at which he proposes it's clock for us to travel our military personnel home," Obama told NBC on Tuesday. </p><p> "At some point, we have got got to state to ourselves that the Iraki authorities have to stand up up and do the difference," he added.</p><p> Both Bill Clinton and Obama have said they would get withdrawing armed combat brigades from Republic Of Iraq almost immediately after taking office. </p><p> "A twelvemonth from now, if I'm the president, we're going to get ending American military engagement in Iraq," Bill Clinton said Tuesday. "I believe that's the right determination for America, for our military and for the Iraqis who have got to come up to clasps with the fact that it's up to them to make up one's mind how to utilize the freedom that they've been given.</p><p> "We cannot enforce a military solution and that's obvious. There doesn't look to be much grounds that they're willing to take that responsibility, and I don't believe they should acquire a clean bank check from the United States any longer," she added.</p><p> In his statement, Petraeus told the Senate Armed Services Committee that he urges allowing American troop degrees in Republic Of Republic Of Iraq to fall to their pre-surge degrees this summer.</p><p> Petraeus said the military should then hesitate for 45 years before deciding on the appropriate troop level.</p><p> On the political side, Crocker pointed to decelerate but steady political advancement in Iraq. </p><p> Crocker also argued that al-Maliki is making more than of an attempt to work with Iraq's assorted cabals and political parties.</p><p> The embassador brought up meddling by Islamic Republic Of Iran and called for greater engagement by Iraq's Arab neighbors.</p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-81614491444242945082008-10-18T08:03:00.001-07:002008-10-18T08:03:58.660-07:00Speier becomes Congress' newest member, is booed by Republicans<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>sfgate_get_fprefs();<br /></p><p>(04-10) 11:45 PDT American Capital - --<br /></p><p>Newly elected Democratic Rep. Jackie Speier of Hillsborough was sworn into United States Congress this morning time and delivered a fiery address criticizing President Bush's Republic Of Iraq policy that led some Republicans to hoot and walk out of the House chamber. </p><p>Speier, who won a particular election Tuesday to fill up the place of the late Rep. Uncle Tom Lantos, was always an vocal lawmaker in her old age as a San Mateo County supervisor, state Assemblywoman and state Senator. She served notice Thursday that she bes after be just as aggressive as a member of the House. </p><p>"The procedure to convey the military personnel place must get immediately," Speier told brother lawmakers including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-San Francisco. "The president desires to remain the course of study and a adult male who desires to replace him proposes we could be in Republic Of Iraq for 100 years. But Dame Speaker, history will not justice us kindly if we give four coevals of Americans because of the foolishness of one."<br /></p><p>While Democrats applauded, Republicans began a chorus of low boos. Some Republicans who had congratulated her just minutes before, including Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Vista (San Diego County), walked out of the hallway in protest. </p><p>Speier's 13-year-old daughter, who was watching from the House gallery, asked, "Why are they booing my mom?"<br /></p><p>After her speech, Speier said she had held more than than 60 populace meetings in recent hebdomads and the most common inquiry was, "When will we acquire out of Iraq?" She said didn't anticipate the negative reaction from Republicans but it didn't trouble oneself her. </p><p>"That's the armed combat that travels on here," she said. "I'm not a newbie to this process."<br /></p><p>Wearing a bright redness overcoat, the 57-year-old Democrat was met with clinches from colleagues, including some Republicans, when she walked into the House chamber this morning. Her friend, Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Atherton, gave her somes kiss. </p><p>After being sworn in by Pelosi, Speier delivered a address that praised her predecessor, Lantos, who died in February of esophageal malignant neoplastic disease after serving more than than two decennaries in Congress. Speier said she recently corrected a talker in her territory who said she was "replacing" Lantos. </p><p>"I had to laugh," she said. "I was elected to win Congressman Lantos. No 1 will ever replace him."<br /></p><p>Her election to United States Congress was a homecoming for Speier, who served as legal advocate in the 1970s to former Peninsula. Rep. Lion Ryan. Ryan was gunned down at the Co-Operative Republic Of Guyana airdrome in 1978 by following of cult leader Rev. Jim Jones, and Speier was also critically injured in the attack. Ryan's daughter, Erin, attended the swearing-in and received a standing ovation. </p><p>Of her old boss, Speier said, "I learned from one of the best."<br /></p><p>Pelosi, who is close to Speier after old age together in Golden State politics, said, "We are all so proud of her. We all knew - one manner or the other - that she was going to come up back here."<br /></p><p>About 60 of Speier's friends and households attended the celebration, wearing pins reading "Jackie 435" - a mention to her low-seniority ranking as Congress' newest member. Her son, Jackson, a sophomore at Leland Stanford University, hubby Barry Dennis, an investing consultant, and his mother, Betty, also attended the swearing-in. </p><p>Speier was busy today, filling out paperwork and moving into Lantos' old office. She project her first ballot on a measure to better the monitoring and wellness of beaches in the United States. She hasn't establish a topographic point to dwell yet and programs to remain with a friend for a while. </p><p>She was elected to function out the remaining calendar months of Lantos' term this year, but to remain in United States Congress she must win a June 3 primary and the general election in November to gain a two-year term beginning in January. </p><p>But she's already made clear she is aiming high, even as a fresher lawmaker. </p><p>She bes after to buttonhole Pelosi for a outstanding commission assignment, and her top marks are the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Congress' head fact-finding panel, and the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which she said would let her to work on issues such as as consumer protection, planetary heating and probes into waste material and fraud. </p><p>Speier also said she have no programs to bespeak earmarks - which she said are often "individual member slush funds" - and hopes to work with United States Congress to reform the procedure of securing federal money for local needs. </p><p>"I don't desire to disadvantage my district," she said. "(But) I really do desire to make a statement about how this procedure have to change."<br /></p><p>As a member of Congress, Speier also goes a superdelegate and could play a cardinal function in the Democratic presidential race. She have endorsed New House Of York Sen. Edmund Hillary Clinton, but she would not state Thursday how she will project her ballot at the Democratic national convention in August. </p><p>E-mail Zachary Coile at .</p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-58820874539904140092008-10-16T13:54:00.001-07:002008-10-16T13:54:32.855-07:00Iraq Was Not A Preemptive War<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p> Nathan Gonzalez <br /> Thu April 10, 12:44 Prime Minister ET </p><p> This week, Republican presidential campaigner Toilet McCain claimed that he would reserve the right to pay preemptive war, and with good reason. After all, preemptive warfare could one twenty-four hours be necessary, and every president should reserve the right to pay it. </p><p>ADVERTISEMENT </p><p><br />The problem, however, is that neither Toilet McCain, nor the mass media for that matter, look to cognize what a preemptive warfare actually is. The Republic Of Iraq War, for one, was not a preemptive war, but a preventative one. There is a large difference. </p><p><br />While a preemptive warfare is the enactment of dramatic an enemy on the threshold of aggression, a preventative warfare is small more than than unprovoked conflict, something that is both criminal under international law, and universally considered to be an immoral act. Preemptive warfare is about self-defense, piece preventative warfare is the channeling of paranoia, or even worse, ulterior motives. </p><p><br />To break understand the differences, let's look at the text edition illustration of preemptive warfare in modern history. Prior to the Six Day War of 1967, Arab Republic Of Egypt and Syrian Arab Republic had been mobilizing their military personnel for what appeared to spell an at hand onslaught on Israel. The rhetoric was tense, and the odor of blood was in the air. Having fought two former warfares of endurance with its Arab neighbors, State Of Israel decided that it could not wait to be attacked -- it struck first. State Of Israel needed the strategical upper manus that come ups with fire the first shots, and many volition reason that it had no pick but to act. </p><p><br />A preventative warfare is something entirely different. Richard Betts of Columbia River University's Institute of War and Peace Studies states that a preemptive warfare is kindred to having two cowpunchers confront each other at high noon. One will pull first, shooting in preemptive fashion. A preventative war, on the other hand, would amount to walking up to a cowpuncher in a barroom while he's playing cards, and shot him indicate clean in the head.*<br /></p><p><br />Preventive warfares are nil new. Roma waged its share of preventative struggles against boisterous barbarians. Japanese Islands attacked Pearl Seaport knowing (or thinking) that it was just a substance of clip before it would have got to struggle America. </p><p><br />The end of preventative warfare have always been to complete off a possible antagonist who might or might not one twenty-four hours be powerful adequate to present a serious challenge. A state should see carefully the sort of historical and ethical bequest it desires to establish, as well as the practical costs associated with acting simply on fearfulnesses of what might happen one twenty-four hours in the distant future. </p><p>In his recent remarks, Toilet McCain seemed to acquire his definition of preemptive warfare only half right, saying at a town-hall meeting in Nutmeg State that "[if] person is about to establish a arm that would devastate America, or have got got the capableness to make so, obviously, you would have to move immediately in defence of this nation's national security interests." Person about to establish a arm that would devastate a state represents an at hand threat. Simply having the capableness to make so? That conveys us to the unsafe kingdom of preventative conflict. </p><p>The media, unfortunately, have got failed to openly discourse the differences between a preemptive warfare and a preventative one. Like the term "weapons of mass destruction," which acquires casually thrown without talking of the specific arms systems in question, the term "preemptive war" have now taken a life of its own, inexplicably becoming synonymous with the Republic Of Iraq conflict. </p><p>, from Salon earlier this year: "McCain was among the most aggressive advocates of a preemptive work stoppage against Saddam Hussein, cosponsoring the declaration authorizing the usage of military unit against Iraq."<br /></p><p><br />If we can actually state the difference between a preemptive warfare and a preventative one, we might come up to footing with the implicit in inquiry posed by this war, namely: What sort of menace represents an contiguous one? Then, and only then, can we get to grip the outrageousness of the blooper we name the Republic Of Iraq War. </p><p><br />* Engaging Iran, pp. 117-118<br /></p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2515193665896735365.post-30969755702927373162008-10-14T19:40:00.001-07:002008-10-14T19:40:31.913-07:00Autism Society of America - Improving the Lives of People Living With Autism Disorders<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'> <p>Bernard Rimland PH.D, founded the Autism Society of United States (ASA) in 1965. Over the last 40 asset old age the society have developed from a smattering of parents trying to do a difference to a prima beginning of information, research and mention on autism. The Autism Society of United States is registered as the biggest and oldest grassroots organisation in the autism community. The organisations tout 200 chapters countrywide and go on to turn each year. The organisation is dedicated to increasing consciousness and providing support to the households and people who are involved in the twenty-four hours to twenty-four hours activities.</p><p>Joining the Autism Society of United States is good in many ways. Your support assists to help in increasing public consciousness and assists to procure support for government-sponsored research. Your support assists supply comfortableness to those in demand and assists you go a portion of a web of people who share that common goal. Your support will also supply entree to The Autism Advocate, which is a quarterly publication and a valuable information source.</p><p>Literally one thousands of people support this organization. The strength is in the Numbers in that voices combined together are louder and will assist raise the voice of autism.</p><p>You make not have got to fall in or be a member to supply support. Donations are accepted and will assist the members of the organisation support education, awareness, research and supply aid to those who necessitate it most. Donations can be made on line or via check. Tribute contributions are also available and may be made to honour or in memory of person you love. Vehicle contributions are also accepted. Workplace parts are also welcome. The ASA is a participant in the Combined Federal Soldier Campaign, United Way, and Mugwump Charities of America. </p><p>The Autism Society of United States website also have a beautiful online shop full of wares and clothing to have on and show and show support. Your support is much needed and appreciated.</p> </div>Morrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11702772217239160115noreply@blogger.com0